Ranges of projected 21st century snowpack loss in the U.S. West. California could experience episodic low-to-no snow as early as the late 2040s and persistent low-to-no snow in the 2060s, according to one high-resolution climate projection. For other parts of the western U.S., persistent low-to-no snow emerges in the 2070s. Graphic: Erica Siirila-Woodburn and Alan Rhoades, 2021 / Nature Reviews Earth and Environment
Ranges of projected 21st century snowpack loss in the U.S. West. California could experience episodic low-to-no snow as early as the late 2040s and persistent low-to-no snow in the 2060s, according to one high-resolution climate projection. For other parts of the western U.S., persistent low-to-no snow emerges in the 2070s. Graphic: Erica Siirila-Woodburn and Alan Rhoades, 2021 / Nature Reviews Earth and Environment

By Denise Chow
1 December 2021

(NBC News) – The Sierra Nevada snowpack, a major source of water for California, could largely disappear in 25 years if global warming continues unchecked, according to a recent study.

The worrisome findings, published 26 October 2021 in the journal Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, have serious implications for California’s water supply and add to a growing list of water woes in the western United States, which remains in the grips of a decades long megadrought.

Scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory used climate models of different warming scenarios to project when the Sierra Nevada snowpack could see dramatic changes. Previous studies have shown that increasing temperatures from human-caused climate change are shrinking snowpacks around the world and altering precipitation patterns.

The researchers found that the snowpack could experience “episodic low-to-no-snow” winters — when more than half of the mountain basin’s accumulated snow vanishes for five consecutive years — by the late 2040s if greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated. The snowpack is then projected to experience “persistent low-to-no-snow” years (when those conditions linger for 10 consecutive winters) in 35 to 60 years, beginning in the late 2050s.

“A low-to-no-snow future has massive implications for where and when water is stored in the western U.S.,” Erica Siirila-Woodburn, a hydrologist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and one of the lead authors of the study, said in a statement.

She said that in addition to consequences for recreation in the region, a severely reduced snowpack could have domino effects for the broader ecosystem.

“So that’s anything ranging from increased wildfire occurrence to changes in groundwater and surface water patterns and changes in vegetation type and density,” Siirila-Woodburn said. [more]

Sierra Nevada snowpack, a crucial water resource, could disappear in 25 years


Satellite view of changes to the Sierra Nevada snowpack, 2006-2021. Photo: NASA
Satellite view of changes to the Sierra Nevada snowpack, 2006-2021. Photo: NASA

Managing Water Resources in a Low-to-No-Snow Future

By Julie Chao
26 October 2021

(Berkeley Lab) – Mountain snowpacks around the world are on the decline, and if the planet continues to warm, climate models forecast that snowpacks could shrink dramatically and possibly even disappear altogether on certain mountains, including in the western United States, at some point in the next century. A new study led by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) analyzes the likely timing of a low-to-no-snow future, what it will mean for water management, and opportunities for investments now that could stave off catastrophic consequences.

Their review paper, “A low-to-no-snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States,” published in the journal Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, analyzes previous climate projections and finds that if greenhouse gas emissions continue along the high-emissions scenario, low-to-no-snow winters will become a regular occurrence in the western U.S. in 35 to 60 years. Further, the study re-evaluates longstanding assumptions in water management in the U.S. and stresses that scientists and water managers need to work together more closely to develop and implement climate adaptation strategies.

The Sierra Nevada, Rockies, Cascades, and other mountain ranges provide a tremendous service by capturing, storing, and releasing water for downstream use. Historically, snowmelt timing provides a critical delay in the delivery of water supply during the spring and into the summer, when precipitation is low and when water demands are at their highest due to agriculture. The factors causing shrinking snowpacks are predominantly tied to temperature increases and shifting precipitation characteristics. Warmer temperatures also imply that storms will produce more rainfall and less snowfall, limiting the amount of seasonal snowpack that can build through the winter.

The research, co-led by authors Erica Siirila-Woodburn and Alan Rhoades of Berkeley Lab’s Earth & Environmental Sciences Area, starts with a literature review which distills several hundred scientific studies on snow loss; of those, they identify and analyze 18 studies that had quantitative snowpack projections for the western U.S.

When will the low-to-no-snow future arrive?

“A recent study highlighted that there has been a 21% decline in the April 1 snowpack water storage in the western U.S. since the 1950s – that’s equivalent to Lake Mead’s storage capacity. In our review, we found that around mid-century we should expect a comparable decline in snowpack,” said Rhoades. “By the end of the century, the decline could reach more than 50%, but with a larger range of uncertainty.”

Many water managers use the somewhat arbitrary date of April 1 to make snowpack observations and planning decisions. Over the last several decades, there have been decreases in peak snowpack volume as well as earlier occurrences of the timing of peak snowpack, with the peak occurring approximately 8 days earlier in the year for every 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming.

Many regions have already experienced winters with very little snow in recent years, such as the Sierras in 2015 when the April 1 snowpack level was 5% of normal, which the authors call an “extreme” event. The paper defines two other types of low-to-no-snow conditions – “episodic low-to-no snow,” or when more than half of a mountain basin experiences low-to-no snow for five consecutive years, and “persistent low-to-no snow,” in which this happens for 10 consecutive years. “Low snow” is defined as when the snowpack (or more precisely, the snow water equivalent, a measure of how much water will be released when the snowpack melts) is in the 30th percentile or lower of the historical peak.

Snow disappearance in the U.S. West based on a low-to-no snow definition. (a) Temporal evolution of the Upper Colorado hydrologic unit (see map on the right) categorized by peak snow water equivalent (SWE) percentiles. The white line indicates the 10-year running average of basin area (both snow and non-snow gridcells) considered low-to-no snow, that is, where an individual year’s peak SWE ≤ 30th historical peak SWE percentile. Data are from a single ensemble member of the 20-km-resolution MRI-AGRCM3-2-S Earth System Model under RCP8.5. Vertical dashed and solid lines indicate the time-to-emergence of episodic and persistent low-to-no snow conditions, respectively, as defined by the onset of 5 and 10 sequential years with low-to-no snow conditions over ≥50 percent of the basin. (b) As in panel a, but for the Great Basin. (c) As in panel a, but for the Pacific Northwest. (d) As in panel a, but for California. Although illustrative of a single simulation, projections such as these demonstrate the utility of the ‘low snow’ and ‘effectively no snow’ definitions, as well as the time-to-emergence concepts. Graphic: Erica Siirila-Woodburn and Alan Rhoades, 2021 / Nature Reviews Earth and Environment
Snow disappearance in the U.S. West based on a low-to-no snow definition. (a) Temporal evolution of the Upper Colorado hydrologic unit (see map on the right) categorized by peak snow water equivalent (SWE) percentiles. The white line indicates the 10-year running average of basin area (both snow and non-snow gridcells) considered low-to-no snow, that is, where an individual year’s peak SWE ≤ 30th historical peak SWE percentile. Data are from a single ensemble member of the 20-km-resolution MRI-AGRCM3-2-S Earth System Model under RCP8.5. Vertical dashed and solid lines indicate the time-to-emergence of episodic and persistent low-to-no snow conditions, respectively, as defined by the onset of 5 and 10 sequential years with low-to-no snow conditions over ≥50 percent of the basin. (b) As in panel a, but for the Great Basin. (c) As in panel a, but for the Pacific Northwest. (d) As in panel a, but for California. Although illustrative of a single simulation, projections such as these demonstrate the utility of the ‘low snow’ and ‘effectively no snow’ definitions, as well as the time-to-emergence concepts. Graphic: Erica Siirila-Woodburn and Alan Rhoades, 2021 / Nature Reviews Earth and Environment

Using these definitions, California could experience episodic low-to-no snow as early as the late 2040s and persistent low-to-no snow in the 2060s according to one high-resolution climate projection. For other parts of the western U.S. persistent low-to-no snow emerges in the 2070s. The authors caution the need for more analyses with a broader set of climate projections to enhance confidence in the timeline for emergence of low-to-no-snow conditions.

The authors describe the climate projections in their study, writing: “Through the middle and end of the 21st century, an increasing fraction of the western U.S. is impacted by snow water equivalent deficits relative to the historical period. In particular, only 8 to 14% of years are classified as low-to-no snow over 1950-2000, compared to 78 to 94% over 2050-2099. In all regions, an abrupt transition occurs in the mid-to-late 21st century.”

Impacts on water resources

The impacts of a low-to-no-snow future extend beyond just decreased streamflow, although that is certainly a significant consequence. In the Sierra Nevada, for example, the amount of water in the snowpack on a typical April 1 is nearly double the surface reservoir storage in California.

“A low-to-no-snow future has massive implications for where and when water is stored in the western U.S.,” said Siirila-Woodburn. “In addition to the direct impacts on recreation and the like, there are a lot of secondary effects on natural and managed systems, from a hydrologic perspective. So that’s anything ranging from increased wildfire occurrence to changes in groundwater and surface water patterns and changes in vegetation type and density.”

With less snow and more rain, groundwater levels in mountainous systems may be impacted because snowmelt more effectively infiltrates into the subsurface than rainfall does. Further, less snow at lower elevations will decrease the overall surface area of snowpack stored in the mountains, potentially resulting in less available snowmelt that infiltrates into the ground. [more]

Managing Water Resources in a Low-to-No-Snow Future