Nobel laureates press EU leaders to classify tar sands as high carbon – ‘The extraction of unconventional fuels is having a particularly devastating impact on climate change’

3 October 2013 (Reuters) – Twenty-one Nobel laureates including South African anti-apartheid campaigner Desmond Tutu have written to European Union leaders urging them to implement a law that would label oil from tar sands as dirtier than other crudes. The EU tar sands proposal has incensed the government of Canada, whose economy is highly dependent on its vast reserves of unconventional oil and it has overshadowed protracted talks on a trade treaty with the EU. The Nobel laureates say the EU law is necessary because “the extraction of unconventional fuels – such as oil sands and oil shale – is having devastating impact on climate change.” The letter was sent this week to European commission president, José Manuel Barroso, and EU heads of state. Apart from Tutu, another peace laureate on the list is Jody Williams, who received the prize for her work to ban landmines. Some others won Nobel prizes for chemistry or medicine. Williams, who is from Vermont in the US, which could be a route for transporting tar sands, says her opposition is both “very personal and very global.” For her it is a matter of world peace. “Climate protection certainly affects any possibility of creating a world of sustainable peace.” Canada sits on the world’s third-largest crude reserves after Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. But the vast majority is unconventional, including tar sands – clay-like deposits that require more energy than conventional oil to extract. Very little of it makes its way to Europe for now, but that could change as new pipelines are being developed such as TransCanada Corp’s Keystone XL pipeline. EU member states approved legislation in 2009, called the fuel quality directive, with the aim of cutting greenhouse gases from transport fuel sold in Europe by 6% by 2020. In October 2011, the commission proposed detailed rules for implementing the law, including default values to rank fuels by their greenhouse gas output over their wells-to-wheels life cycle. So far the commission has said it is standing by its value for tar sands – of 107 grams per megajoule – making it clear to buyers that the fuel source had more greenhouse gas impact than average crude oil at 87.5g. Intense Canadian lobbying and an inconclusive EU vote on the law forced the commission to announce an assessment of the impact of the fuel quality directive in April 2012. [more]

Nobel laureates press EU leaders to classify tar sands as high carbon

BRUSSELS, 3 October 2013 (Nobel Women’s Initiative) – A group of twenty-one Nobel peace and science laureates sent a letter this week to European Commission president José Manuel Barroso urging him and European Union environment ministers to immediately implement the EU Fuel Quality Directive (FQD). The FQD is a European Union fuel law that is designed to reduce emissions from transportation fuel by six per cent by 2020. If properly implemented, the law will provide a much-needed incentive for oil companies to invest in lower-carbon sources and emission reduction technologies. In their letter, the laureates say that now is the “time to transition swiftly away from fossil fuels, with a special focus on those that pollute the most.”  They note that implementation of the new fuel law would send a “clear signal that the European Union is committed to action that supports the rights of future generations to a healthy planet.” The letter highlights the European Commission’s own scientific research which found that one of the unconventional fuel sources identified in the proposed policy,  tar sands, produces an average of 23% more greenhouse gas emissions than average conventional oil. Amid fierce Canadian, US and oil industry lobbying, the European Commission is delaying the publication of a proposal on how to implement the FQD, which was expected in September. A vote by EU environment ministers is expected in December. The laureates’ letter to the European Commission President comes days after the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which delivered the message that the world must act urgently to get global emissions under control to avoid calamitous climate change. The letter also follows on President Obama’s call to address climate change and comes less than a year after the International Energy Agency said two-thirds of all known fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground in order to meet internationally agreed upon climate goals. The laureates say that the “time for positive action is now” and call for future built on “safe, clean and renewable energy”. The laureates who signed the letter include two Nobel peace prize winners who are members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, nine other science laureates, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Jody Williams and Shirin Ebadi. Please see the full letter below.  Or download the PDF here.
–30– For more information, please contact: Rachel Vincent,
Director of Media & Communications
Phone +1 613-569-8400 ext.113
rvincent@nobelwomensinitiative.org The Nobel Women’s Initiative was established in 2006, and is led by Nobel Peace laureates Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi, Rigoberta Menchú Tum, Leymah Gbowee, Tawakkol Karman and Mairead Maguire. The Nobel Women’s Initiative uses the prestige of the Nobel Peace Prize and of courageous women peace laureates to magnify the power and visibility of women working in countries around the world for peace, justice and equality. ### Letter to EU Commissioners and Environment Ministers re EU climate legislation and unconventional fossil fuels The world can no longer ignore, except at our own peril, that climate change is one of the greatest threats facing life on this planet today. The impacts of climate change and extreme resource extraction are exacerbating conflicts and environmental destruction around the world.   The extraction of unconventional fuels—such as oil sands and oil shale—is having a particularly devastating impact on climate change. For this reason, we are writing to urge you to support the immediate implementation of the European Union’s (EU) Fuel Quality Directive in order to fulfill its 6% reduction target in greenhouse gas emissions from fuels used for transportation by 2020. We have no doubt that the Directive must be applied fairly to unconventional fuels to ensure their climate impacts are fully taken into account.  It follows that the fuel-producing companies should report their climate emissions and be held responsible for any emissions increase. We welcome the EU’s scientific analysis—as it is now proposed for the implementation of the EU Directive—that the extraction and production of fuels from unconventional sources fuels including oil sands, coal-to-liquid, and oil shale leads to higher emissions and that this should be reflected in the regulations. The International Energy Agency  (IEA) is warning that unconventional fuel sources are especially damaging to the environment and climate, and is concerned that these fuel sources are now increasingly competing on a par with conventional fuel sources.  In order to avoid catastrophic climate change, the IEA calculates that two thirds of known fossil fuel reserves must be left in the ground. Now is the time to transition swiftly away from fossil fuels, with a special focus on those that pollute the most. We must all move toward a future built on safe, clean and renewable energy.  Fully implementing the EU’s Fuel Quality Directive will send a clear signal that the European Union is committed to action that supports the rights of future generations to a healthy planet. It is not too late to avert our actions that only amount to palliative care for a dying planet. The time for positive action is now.  The European Union can demonstrate clear and unambiguous leadership by upholding its climate principles.  We look forward to working together as we move forward to confront this frightening challenge to our global survival. Mairead Maguire, Nobel Peace Prize, 1976, Ireland Roger Guillemin, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1977, France Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Nobel Peace Prize 1980, Argentina Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace Prize 1984, South Africa Rigoberta Menchú Tum, Nobel Peace Prize, 1992, Guatemala Richard Roberts, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1993, United Kingdom Paul Crutzen, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1995, Netherlands Harold Kroto, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1996, United Kingdom José Ramos-Horta, Nobel Peace Prize, 1996, East Timor John Walker, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1997, UK Jody Williams, Nobel Peace Prize, 1997, USA John Hume, Nobel Peace Prize, 1998, Ireland Paul Greengard, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 2000, USA Shirin Ebadi, Nobel Peace Prize, 2003, Iran Gerhard Ertl, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2007, Germany Mark Jaccard, member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Nobel Peace Prize, 2007, Canada John Stone, member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Nobel Peace Prize, 2007, Canada Martin Chalfie, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2008, USA Thomas Steitz, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2009, USA Leymah Gbowee, Nobel Peace Prize, 2011, Liberia Tawakkol Karman, Nobel Peace Prize, 2011, Yemen

Nobel peace and science laureates calling for EU action on tar sands