As Japan swings away from nuclear power, higher oil dependency erases greenhouse-gas gains
By Associated Press TOKYO – The Fukushima crisis is eroding years of Japanese efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming, as power plants running on oil and natural gas fill the electricity gap left by now-shuttered nuclear reactors. Before last year’s devastating tsunami triggered meltdowns at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, Japan had planned to meet its carbon emissions reduction targets on the assumption that it would rely on nuclear power, long considered a steady, low-emissions source of energy. But now it’s unclear to what extent nuclear energy will even be part of the electricity mix. Japan will be free of atomic power for the first time since 1966 on Saturday, when the last of its 50 usable reactors is switched off for regular inspections. The central government would like to restart them at some point, but it is running into strong opposition from local citizens and governments. With the loss of nuclear energy, the Ministry of Environment projects that Japan will produce about 15 percent more greenhouse gas emissions this fiscal year than it did in 1990, the baseline year for measuring progress in reducing emissions. In fiscal 2010, Japan’s actual emissions were close to 1990 levels. It also raises doubts about whether it will be able to meet a pledge made in Copenhagen in 2009 to slash emissions by 25 percent from 1990 levels by 2020. For years, nuclear power was a pillar in Japan’s energy and climate policies. Until the Fukushima disaster last year, it accounted for about a third of Japan’s power generation, and Tokyo had planned to expand that to half by 2030. Now Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda has pledged to reduce reliance on nuclear power, although his government is eager to restart some reactors to meet a looming power crunch during the hot summer months. “The big open question is whether and when the nuclear plants will come back on line, and what that implies for Japan’s long-term emissions trajectory,” said Elliot Diringer, executive vice president at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, formerly the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in Arlington, Virginia. “If nuclear will no longer be a part of the energy mix, Japan is going to have a much tougher time reducing emissions,” he said. […]
As Japan swings away from nuclear power, higher oil dependency erases greenhouse-gas gains
How do we define "emissions," what happens to the heat when we cook a star to 5000 degrees C and then cool it off to 300 degrees C, and what are those "cooling towers" for in nuke plants if the water is supposed to cool the reactors? Should we include depleted uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan and Cesium in milk in San Francisco as part of the "emissions"? Do we include uranium byproducts from uranium mining in emissions? How about uranium enrichment wastes?
And what happens when the private nuclear corporations go belly up and walk away from these plants. What do we do with the spent fuel pools then? Enquiring minds want to know.