Subarctic wildfires a ‘runaway climate change’ risk
PARIS (AFP) – Global warming is driving forest fires in northern latitudes to burn more frequently and fiercely, contributing to the threat of runaway climate change, according to a study released Sunday. Increased intensity of fires in Alaska’s vast interior over the last decade has changed the region from a sink to a source of carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas most responsible for heating up the planet, the study found. On balance, in other words, boreal forests in the northern hemisphere may now soak up less of the heat-trapping gas than they give off. The bulk of the released CO2 comes not from the burning trees, but from what is in the ground. “Most of what fuels a boreal fire is plant litter, moss and organic matter in surface soils,” said Merritt Turetsky, a professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada and lead author of the study. The findings are worrisome, he said, because about half of the world’s soil carbon is trapped in northern permafrost and peatlands. “This is carbon that has accumulated in ecosystems a little bit at a time for thousands of years, but is being released very rapidly.” While the study, published in Nature Geoscience, focused on Alaska’s 18.5 million hectares (45 million acres) of forests, its conclusions likely apply to huge expanses of wilderness in Siberia, Canada and northern Europe as well. Out-of-control fires ravaged more than a million hectares in Russia earlier this year, destroying whole villages and leaving more than 50 people dead. The shift of subarctic forests and peatlands from a CO2-absorbing sponge to a net source of the gas means that these regions could help trigger accelerated global warming, the study warned. “Essentially, it represents a runaway climate change scenario in which warming is leading to larger and more intense fires, releasing more greenhouse gases and resulting in more warming,” said Turestsky. … The amount of scorched earth has doubled in interior Alaska over the last 10 years, mostly because of increased burning late in the fire season, they found. “We have demonstrated for the first time that increases in burned area are clearly linked to increases in fire severity,” said co-author Eric Kasische, a professor at the University of Maryland. “This not only impacts carbon storage, but also will accelerate permafrost loss and changes in forest cover.” Ten of billions of tonnes of another potent greenhouse gas, methane, are also trapped inside permafrost. …
I think my "OH SHIT" key is stuck in the ON position……
I live in Northern California where we get fires nine months of the year. Peat fires are some of the worst; they flood the area for months to put them out.
How are we going to flood Siberia?