Shortly before the Deepwater Horizon blowout, Halliburton bought an oil spill prevention firm. The oil-services industry is consolidating, which is not necessarily good news for quality, experts say.  Tim Probert (r.) of Halliburton is sworn in along with officials from BP and Transocean before Senate hearings on the Gulf oil spill May 11, 2010. Tim Sloan / AFP / Newscom

By Matt Rocheleau, Contributor / June 18, 2010 Eleven days prior to the April 20 Deepwater Horizon blowout, Halliburton Co., the contractor in charge of cementing the rig’s well, agreed to purchase a little-known company. The firm, Boots and Coots, focuses on oil spill prevention and blowout response. Now, it is assisting with the relief well work – under contract to BP – to help stop the Gulf oil spill. What appears to conspiracy theorists as more than a coincidence is nothing out of the ordinary, say oil-industry experts. Increasingly, oil-industry titans are buying up smaller companies that provide all manner of services. But this trend is worrying in itself, the experts say. As companies grow and work both to drill wells and potentially clean up their own mistakes, the result can be unintentional, but riskier decisionmaking over time due to a lack of focus – particularly in an industry that is poorly regulated. Moreover, there is concern that – as the Gulf oil spill shows – big bureaucracies are not nimble enough in an emergency. “Working on both sides of the fence,” is not uncommon in the oil industry, says Robert Gramling, author of Oil on the Edge: Offshore Development, Conflict, Gridlock. But “it makes for a very complex decision-making environment that can become problematic,” he adds. The concern is not so much about intentional negligence but creeping complacency. …

How Halliburton is profiting from the Gulf oil spill