Senate energy bill would fan the flames of climate change

By Wenonah Hauter and Bill Mckibben
15 July 2017
(The Hill) – In a frantic attempt to demonstrate that Senate Republicans are capable of governing despite their shameful attempt to yank health insurance away from 22 million Americans, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) moved in late June to advance a huge, 800-page energy bill to the Senate floor. In his rush to get something — anything — done, he bypassed the standard committee review process and pushed the legislation straight to the full Senate floor.
There are plenty of compelling reasons for Senator Schumer (D-N.Y.) to marshal Democratic opposition to McConnell’s bad energy bill. The most basic is that Republicans and the Trump administration are clamoring for a win — literally anything they can point to as business getting done. They seek to strip healthcare from many of the most vulnerable Americans in order to generate huge tax cuts for the wealthiest few. This deplorable intention alone should motivate Democrats to resist everything Trump and the Republicans seek, including McConnell’s energy bill.But there’s more to the story. This bill, the Energy and Natural Resources Act of 2017, is a shameless giveaway to the polluting oil and gas industry. It would lock in our country’s dependence on dirty fossil fuels for decades to come and intentionally undermine critical state and federal efforts to promote clean, renewable energy — our only path to staving off the worst effects of impending climate chaos.McConnell’s energy package would speed approval of exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG), give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission more power to approve natural gas pipelines and spend nearly $200 million researching how to access methane, a greenhouse gas that traps 87-times more greenhouse gas heat than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period, beneath the ocean floor. Expediting the build-out of fossil fuel infrastructure takes us in exactly the wrong direction at a time when we must urgently transition to a low-carbon economy. Building LNG export terminals would lead to expanded hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) across the country, meaning the development of new pipelines, new compressor stations and new gas storage facilities.Increased fracking for natural gas would also feed the construction of new gas-fired power plants for domestic energy consumption — to say nothing of the inherent risks to air, water and human health fracking imposes on front-line communities where it occurs. Even with the incredible profit margins built into global fossil fuel markets, such large scale investment in new natural gas infrastructure will require decades to be recouped by corporations. Once pipelines are laid, export terminals are completed and wells are fracked, we can be sure such infrastructure will be operated until profits are returned. By that time, decades from now, it will be far too late to save us. [more]

Senate energy bill would fan the flames of climate change

By Janet Redman
11 July 2017
(Oil Change International) – The Energy and Natural Resources Act of 2017 (S.1460) would pave the way for fossil fuel
expansion, locking in decades of dirty energy and undermining the necessary clean energy
transition.
The best available science shows an urgent need move off fossil fuels to avoid severe disruptions to our communities, our economy,
and the planet. Burning the oil, gas, and coal reserves in already operating wells and mines
would take us beyond globally agreed climate
limits. Promoting new fossil fuels in the face
of our climate crisis represents the latest form of climate denial. We simply cannot afford
new infrastructure that expands fossil fuels.
Yet, this dirty energy bill:

Speeds up approval of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) export terminals [Sec. 2201]

The bill requires the Department of Energy to issue a decision on whether to authorize large-scale infrastructure projects within 45
days of issuance of the final environmental review. This rushes the timeline for the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to thoroughly evaluate the review and undercuts
the public’s ability to ensure that projects will not harm communities and ecosystems impacted by terminals and related pipelines,
storage facilities and other infrastructure.
More LNG export terminals means more gas pipelines, more fracking, and more climate pollution.

Forces federal and state agencies to give
“deference” to FERC in gas project review process [Sec. 3103]

FERC has a long history of rubber-stamping gas pipelines and other infrastructure projects while ignoring concerns raised by economists, climate scientists, and impacted communities about avoidable costs and environmental
harm. S.1460 makes FERC the lead in ensuring gas projects comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act – cutting off avenues
for communities to appeal to state and other
federal agencies to help stop pipelines. The
bill also requires any federal or state agency,
local government or tribe participating in the
review process make a final decision no later
than 90 days after FERC considers an
application to be complete, making it all but
impossible for impacted communities to wade
through complex project documents and raise
challenges in time. Rushing FERC to approve a
natural gas buildout would undermine the
public interest and U.S. climate goals.

Wastes billions on boondoggle coal projects [Sec. 3402]

In an act of climate denial and ignoring clear trends in the national energy market, the bill establishes a new coal technology program to
“ensure the continued use of the abundant,
domestic coal resources.” It authorizes $3.1
billion over 5 years for carbon capture
research, development, and demonstration
projects – even as the nation’s premiere “clean coal” power plant shutters its doors.
Unproven and energy-intensive technologies
like carbon capture do nothing to protect
communities from the full impacts of coal
power – from mining, to transport, to coal ash
disposal.

More handouts to dirty energy development

In addition, S.1460 sets up a pilot program to
streamline the review and approval of permits to drill for oil and gas on the nation’s public
lands [Sec. 3104], and authorizes Congress to
spend $175 million on research and
development for extracting methane hydrates
[Sec. 3101] – another potential source of fossil
fuel that we cannot afford to burn.

No love for renewables

Surprisingly, fast-growing and increasingly cost-competitive wind and solar power get little mention in this bill. And the renewable
energy provisions that are included are
undermined by support for fossil fuel
infrastructure that would entrench dirty
energy in our country’s power mix and put us
on a path to climate chaos.

Vote “no” on S. 1460

Expediting the expansion of fossil fuel
infrastructure undermines what the American people want and need – action on climate
change and the creation of good jobs in the
sustainable energy sector. Passing the Energy
and Natural Resources Act of 2017 would be a giveaway to the oil, gas, and coal industry and
an act of climate denial.

Contact

Janet Redman
Oil Change International
janet@priceofoil.org

Dirty Distraction: The Energy and Natural Resources Act of 2017 (S.1460)