Obama under pressure to show Doha he is serious on climate change
Suzanne Goldenberg US environment correspondent
23 November 2012 (guardian.co.uk) – Barack Obama is being pressed for proof of his intent to act on climate change ahead of next week’s United Nations global warming summit in Doha. The proof might boil down to just two words: two degrees. An early statement at Doha that America remains committed to the global goal of limiting warming to 2C above pre-industrial levels would be a clear sign. Every statement from US diplomats at the Doha negotiations will be closely scrutinised for signs that Obama will indeed make climate change a priority of his second term – and that America remains committed to the global agreement diplomats have been seeking for 20 years. Campaigners say Obama’s re-election, superstorm Sandy and New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s endorsement – predicated on climate change – put climate change back on the domestic agenda. Opinion polls suggest public concern in the US about climate change was rising even before Sandy. Campaigners argue Obama needs to engage on climate, if he wants to safeguard his legacy as president. “President Obama’s re-election provides him with an opportunity to seal his legacy as a truly transformative leader, but he needs to address climate change,” said Andrew Steer, president of the World Resources Institute. “I think history will judge any president from now onwards not to have succeeded if he doesn’t really grapple with this issue seriously.” Early indications are that Obama will spend more time on climate change than in his first term. He invoked “the destructive power of a warming planet” in his re-election speech. He told reporters he would make climate change a personal mission of his second term. At his first White House press conference, Obama spoke of starting a national conversation about climate risks, and building a bipartisan consensus for action. But the president also made clear the economy remained his number one focus. At Doha, negotiators will be looking for signs of how Obama plans to put his climate mission in action. Hardened climate observers will be watching whether Todd Stern, the state department climate envoy, reaffirms America’s commitment to the climate platform reached in Durban last year – including a core goal of limiting warming to 2C. Some campaigners fear America is backing off from that promise, following a speech at Dartmouth University earlier this year in which Stern said signing on to the 2C goal was unrealistic for some countries. “It makes perfect sense on paper. The trouble is it ignores the classic lesson that politics – including international politics – is the art of the possible,” Stern said in the speech. “If countries are told that, in order to reach a global goal, they must accept targets their leadership sees as contrary to their core interest in growth and development those countries are likely to say no.” The talk, with its suggestion of a retreat from the Durban platform, caused enormous concern among campaign groups. Jennifer Morgan of WRI said in the reporters’ conference call she would be watching to see whether America continued to back away from the goal, or whether it was back on side. Stern has not been giving interviews prior to the Doha talks. […]
Obama under pressure to show Doha he is serious on climate change
Kevin Anderson makes it very clear, we've ZERO chance of only warming two degrees, 2C which is now being widely understood as "catastrophic" for humanity anyway.
We're already blowing past 4C in pipeline and on target for higher temperatures that that. I've got a writeup on this here: <a href="http://survivalacres.com/blog/out-of-time-out-of-realistic-options/>Out of Time – Out of Options</a>.
An important, but oft-overlooked issue is most reports and assessments are two years or more of out date (even "newly" released) due to delays inherent in the peer-review process.
Politicians are woefully ill-prepared to deal with the very rapid pace of assessments now taking place. What this means if their are literally off "by decades" at how fast and how utterly serious climate change effects actually are.
Anderson makes it very clear — we don't stand a chance of meeting anything non-catastrophic. ~Survival Acres~