Leaked documents reveal Heartland Institute’s assault on climate science: ‘Dissuading teachers from teaching science’
[Update: The “dissuading teachers” document is probably fake, but the rest appear legit. ] [Desdemona wonders if the commercial mass media will give this story the same attention that the manufactured “Climategate” affair received.]
By Phil Plait
15 February 2012 The Heartland Institute — a self-described “think tank” that actually serves in part as a way for climate change denialism to get funded — has a potentially embarrassing situation on their hands. Someone going by the handle “Heartland Insider” has anonymously released quite a few of what are claimed to be internal documents from Heartland, revealing the Institute’s strategies, funds, and much more. These documents are available over at DeSmogBlog. Several people are going over them, and so far they appear legit. You can read some relevant discussions at DeSmogBlog, Deep Climate, Planet 3, Greg Laden, ClimateCrocks, Shawn Otto, and Think Progress. John Mashey at DeSmogBlog has more info that also corroborates the leaked documents, and to call it blistering is to severely underestimate it. One thing I want to point out right away which is very illuminating, if highly disturbing, about what Heartland allegedly wants to do: they are considering developing a curriculum for teachers to use in the classroom to sow confusion about climate change. I know, it sounds like I’m making that up, but I’m not. In this document they say:[Dr. Wojick‘s] effort will focus on providing curriculum that shows that the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain – two key points that are effective at dissuading teachers from teaching science.
That seems clear enough, doesn’t it? From that, it sure sounds like they want to dissuade teachers from teaching science. I imagine there will be a lot of spin about how this quote is out of context, or a typo, or something alone those lines. Perhaps. But I remember all the hammering real scientists took when they used jargon in their emails to each other, jargon which was gleefully misinterpreted to make it seem as if these scientists were faking data. Interesting how this is pointing right back at them. Just as I said it does. […]
Breaking news: A look behind the curtain of the Heartland Institute’s climate change spin
Don't "wonder" about any of this. Only wonder why it took this long to have this kind of malfeasance on the part of climate denialists uncovered.
Anyone (individual, group, organization, entity, government) that chooses to ignore what world experts are saying about climate change is demonstrably a crackpot.
Asking teacher to not teach science is also evidence of their corrupt and evil nature.
I'll add to that, because this fits so well: usually it's the religious nutters that refuse to believe what has been clearly shown to be true. Asking educational institutions to deny the truth fits the religious nutter category to a "T".
Thanks Jim for this wonderful posting… This is perhaps the most important of the widely ignored stories on climate warming.
Our mainstream media is worthless.