Students attend the opening ceremony of new semester at the elementary school in Fukushima, Japan, April 6, 2011. Most of the schools began their regular classes on Wednesday in the city of Fukushima. Ji Chunpeng / Xinhua

By arevamirpal::laprimavera
5 October 2011 A mere formality probably at this point, but it is upsetting some people in Japan right now. From Yomiuri Shinbun (10/6/2011):

国内の被曝(ひばく)線量の基準などを検討する文部科学省の放射線審議会の基本部会は６日、東京電力福島第一原子力発電所事故で放射性物質が拡散した状況下の一般住民の被曝線量について、「年間１～２０ミリ・シーベルトの範囲で可能な限り低い値を段階的に設定する」とする見解案をまとめた。 The Radiation Council at the Ministry of Education and Science submitted its opinion on the domestic standard on radiation exposure on October 6. Considering the current situation of radioactive materials widely spread after the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident, the Council’s opinion is to set the lowest possible standard in stages between 1 to 20 millisieverts per year for the residents in Japan [who are not engaged in occupations that deal with radiation]. 国際放射線防護委員会（ＩＣＲＰ）の２００７年の勧告を国内にも適用した。 It is the recommendation of the ICRP in 2007, and the Council has adopted that recommendation for the domestic standard. 一般住民の平常時の被曝線量限度は、年間１ミリ・シーベルトとされている。しかし、同部会は放射性物質の汚染が広がる現状を線源が計画的に管理されていない「現存被ばく状況」と判断、基準を緩和して「年間１～２０ミリ・シーベルト」のＩＣＲＰ勧告を国内に導入するかどうか検討していた。 The peacetime radiation exposure limit for the residents in Japan is 1 millisievert per year. However, the Council determined the current situation in Japan of ever spreading radioactive contamination to be that of “existing radiation exposure” [I do not know the formal ICRP’s term] where the source of radiation is not systematically controlled. It had been discussing whether to loosen the existing standard and introduce the ICRP’s recommendation of “between 1 and 20 millisieverts per year” as the new domestic standard.

It is very interesting that this government council considers the current situation as “not systematically controlled” and that the radiation contamination continues to spread after nearly 7 months, no matter what the talking heads on TV and the DPJ politicians say (that the plant is stable) and do (abolish “evacuation-ready zone” and make the residents return). When an adjunct council like this submits its opinion, it is a mere formality in Japan and will be quickly adopted by the government and made it into a law. Just to remind you, in pre-Fukushima Japan, the radiation exposure from natural sources, counting both internal radiation (radon inhalation, food ingestion) and external radiation (cosmic rays, ground), was 1.5 millisievert per year average. In Kanto and Tohoku, the number was lower than the average, whereas in the western part of Japan it was generally higher. The 1 millisievert per year limit set by law is for the artificial radiation exposure which is deemed necessary and/or whose benefit outweighs the adverse effect (medical treatment, travel by airplane). Now, this limit may be set at maximum 20 millisieverts (they may pick a lower number not to upset many people) only to be lowered in stages if the situation improves. And the new limit will have nothing to do with medical necessity or convenience; it will be because there will be no choice for people but to live with the high level of radiation for indeterminable amount of time, which the government is ever eager to raise even higher. […]

Japan’s Ministry of Education Ready to Formally Loosen the Annual Radiation Exposure Limit